🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.3/5 from 878+ reviews
Men āœ“ In Stock šŸ”„ Bestseller 

28x30 baggy jeans with sick wash

ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜… 4.3 out of 5 (878 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$35
$58.33
Sale
āœ“ complimentary dispatch on this item • Limited time offer

super sick baggy jeans size 28x30 been worn a little but not to much paid 100$ asking 35 obo

šŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy delivery
ā†©ļø
plain Returns

šŸ“‹ Product Description

28x30 baggy jeans with sick wash

super sick baggy jeans size 28x30 been worn a little but not to much paid 100$ asking 35 obo

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Men products.

šŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 23570

Category: Men > Jeans > Baggy, Loose

Original Price: $58.33 USD

Sale Price: $35 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand only-arrived

🚚 distribution & Returns

āœ“ no-cost shipment on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.3
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
Based on 878 reviews
AH
Andrew Hall āœ“ Verified
2 weeks ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
ideal for 28x30 baggy jeans with sick wash
Honestly, the 28x30 baggy jeans with sick wash works well enough which is good enough. Packaging was easy.​
KC
Kayla Campbell āœ“ Verified
1 month ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
terrific 28x30 baggy jeans with sick wash!
At first, the 28x30 baggy jeans with sick wash fits my needs so I’m okay with it.
JB
Justin Baker āœ“ Verified
4 weeks ago

ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
superb 28x30 baggy jeans with sick wash!
So far, the 28x30 baggy jeans with sick wash is practical and it meets expectations. Works fine so far.
BW
Brandon Wright āœ“ Verified
1 week ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
supreme Purchase Ever
The 28x30 baggy jeans with sick wash is uncomplicated to use and looks fabulous. So happy with this purchase!
DC
Daniel Clark āœ“ Verified
2 months ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
fabulous Value for Money
After certain use, the 28x30 baggy jeans with sick wash performs as expected and it works for me.