🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.7/5 from 522+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

UZU Pro Sun Screen 80ml SPF50 PA+++

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.7 out of 5 (522 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$25
$41.67
Sale
βœ“ complimentary dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

UZU Pro Sun Screen 80ml SPF50 PA+++

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy delivery
↩️
plain Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

UZU Pro Sun Screen 80ml SPF50 PA+++

UZU Pro Sun Screen 80ml SPF50 PA+++

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 580785

Category: Vintage > Electronics > Other

Original Price: $41.67 USD

Sale Price: $25 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand only-arrived

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ no-cost shipment on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days​

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.7
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 4201 reviews
JB
Justin Baker βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Nashville, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Super happy
The UZU Pro Sun Screen 80ml SPF50 PA feels solid and long-lasting.
13 people found this helpful
KG
Kevin Green βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Indianapolis, IN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
ideal for my needs
So far, the UZU Pro Sun Screen 80ml SPF50 PA works well enough so no complaints.
2 people found this helpful
SA
Samantha Adams βœ“ Verified Purchase 
4 months ago Β· Aurora, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Worth every penny
In daily use, the UZU Pro Sun Screen 80ml SPF50 PA is effortless to use and it’s fine overall. Packaging was easy.
44 people found this helpful
RS
Rachel Scott βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Boston, MA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Brilliant UZU Pro Sun Screen 80ml SPF50 PA ​
The UZU Pro Sun Screen 80ml SPF50 PA is uncomplicated to use and clean.
4 people found this helpful
DA
David Anderson
5 months ago Β· Fort Worth, TX

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fabulous quality
So far, it works well enough and it works for me. Packaging was basic.
40 people found this helpful