🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.6/5 from 748+ reviews
Home βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller 

32 inch Sylvania Flatscreen TV

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.6 out of 5 (748 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$40
$66.67
Sale
βœ“ complimentary dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

32inchesWorks 100%No remote included.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy delivery
↩️
plain Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

32 inch Sylvania Flatscreen TV

32inches
Works 100%
No remote included.

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Home products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 842837

Category: Home > Furniture > Home Entertainment Furniture

Original Price: $66.67 USD

Sale Price: $40 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand only-arrived

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ no-cost shipment on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.6
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 6089 reviews
BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Minneapolis, MN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fantastic quality
it feels solid enough so I’m okay with it.
13 people found this helpful
MR
Mike Reynolds βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Chicago, IL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superb choice
For the price, the 32 inch Sylvania Flatscreen TV fits my needs so it’s acceptable.
37 people found this helpful
DC
Daniel Clark βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Albuquerque, NM
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
really satisfied
After certain use, the 32 inch Sylvania Flatscreen TV feels solid so no complaints. Packaging was easy.
39 people found this helpful

DA
David Anderson βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Phoenix, AZ
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Brilliant 32 inch Sylvania Flatscreen TV
So far, the 32 inch Sylvania Flatscreen TV fits my needs which is good enough.
21 people found this helpful
NH
Nicole Harris βœ“ Verified Purchase
12 months ago Β· St. Louis, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
outstanding in every way
The 32 inch Sylvania Flatscreen TV feels lighter than expected, but it works.
11 people found this helpful