🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.6/5 from 236+ reviews
Men βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

GINGHAM POPLIN - Boxer shorts

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.6 out of 5 (236 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$15.95
$26.58
Sale
βœ“ complimentary dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Rise : NormalPattern : CheckedArticle number : M3I82O05B-K12

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy delivery
↩️
plain Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

GINGHAM POPLIN - Boxer shorts

Rise : Normal
Pattern : Checked
Article number : M3I82O05B-K12

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Men products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1472351

Category: Men > Clothing > Underwear & Socks

Original Price: $26.58 USD

Sale Price: $15.95 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand only-arrived

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ no-cost shipment on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days​

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.6
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 8197 reviews
AP
Adam Parker βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Jacksonville, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A must-have
At first, the GINGHAM POPLIN - Boxer shorts works well enough and I’m satisfied.
42 people found this helpful
JW
Jennifer Wilson βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Boston, MA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
So glad I bought this
The GINGHAM POPLIN - Boxer shorts is fine if you’re not expecting premium quality.
20 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson βœ“ Verified Purchase 
11 months ago Β· Omaha, NE
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A+ quality
To be fair, it is practical which feels reasonable.
13 people found this helpful
MK
Megan King βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Pittsburgh, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
adore this GINGHAM POPLIN - Boxer shorts!​
The GINGHAM POPLIN - Boxer shorts works consistently so far.
30 people found this helpful
JB
Justin Baker βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Jacksonville, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A+ quality
From my experience, the GINGHAM POPLIN - Boxer shorts works fine so it’s acceptable.
36 people found this helpful