🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 159+ reviews
Men βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller 

Vintage 90s Nike Turtleneck Longsleeve

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.1 out of 5 (159 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$18
$30
Sale
βœ“ complimentary dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Tagged XXLChest 24inLength 31inFlawlessClean and plain, faultless for cold weather

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
expedient Shipping
↩️
functional Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage 90s Nike Turtleneck Longsleeve

Tagged XXL
Chest 24in
Length 31in

Flawless

Clean and elementary, faultless for cold weather​

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Men products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2424508

Category: Men > Tops > Turtlenecks

Original Price: $30 USD

Sale Price: $18 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ no-cost shipment on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days​

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.1
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 3777 reviews
LN
Lauren Nelson βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Austin, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
finest decision
At first, it performs as expected which feels reasonable.​
43 people found this helpful
DC
Daniel Clark βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Milwaukee, WI

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Couldn't be happier
The Vintage 90s Nike Turtleneck Longsleeve doesn’t cause any inconvenience.
28 people found this helpful
AR
Aaron Roberts βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Tampa, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
marvelous product
Honestly, it works fine and it meets expectations.
21 people found this helpful
AH
Andrew Hall βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Phoenix, AZ
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
outstanding purchase
The Vintage 90s Nike Turtleneck Longsleeve works fine for daily use.
39 people found this helpful
WG
William Garcia
10 months ago Β· St. Louis, MO

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
fancy it!
After several use, the Vintage 90s Nike Turtleneck Longsleeve works well enough and it meets expectations.
50 people found this helpful