🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.5/5 from 667+ reviews
Kids βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller 

Vintage toddler wrangler jeans

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.5 out of 5 (667 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$18.05
$30.08
Sale
βœ“ complimentary dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Size 18 months GUCbundle to hold on to!

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
express distribution
↩️
user-friendly Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage toddler wrangler jeans

Size 18 months GUC
bundle to store!​

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Kids products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2482412

Category: Kids > Boys Bottoms > Boys 0-24 mos

Original Price: $30.08 USD

Sale Price: $18.05 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand merely-arrived

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ no-cost dispatch on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days​

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.5
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 3508 reviews
AR
Aaron Roberts βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· St. Louis, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
treasure it!
Honestly, the Vintage toddler wrangler jeans performs as expected which feels reasonable.​
9 people found this helpful
RM
Robert Martinez βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Omaha, NE

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
finest decision
After certain use, the Vintage toddler wrangler jeans works well enough and it works for me.
16 people found this helpful
WG
William Garcia βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Miami, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
remarkably pleased
Personally, it feels okay which feels reasonable.
15 people found this helpful
AH
Andrew Hall βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Oakland, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Simply incredible
The Vintage toddler wrangler jeans is straightforward to use and clean.
46 people found this helpful
SM
Sarah Miller βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Atlanta, GA

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
splendid choice
From my experience, the Vintage toddler wrangler jeans works well enough so it’s acceptable. distribution was normal.
42 people found this helpful